"fun" C++ quiz time. what will this program print? (and why?)
@aras -7? The tricky part being:
int x = -1[p].x;
which could be rewritten as:
int x = -p.x;
because ptr[index] == index[ptr] because pointer arithmetic, C, and the glory that is programming.
@jeffrey close, but no. operator precedence with the minus!
@jpab close, but not quite! That minus is subject to operator precedence rules...
@aras oh well, there had to be one more thing I was missing!
@jpab Pppfffbbhhhh, that (a,b,c) = c got me.
@aras I assume it must be -9. The bracket and comma initialisers just cancel down, p is pointing to the 2nd element, 1[p] is same as p (ie. Now the 3rd element in arr) because magic, operator precedence puts the negate after the resolve, so x of the 3rd is 9, which is then negated?
@aras arg, looked it up, comma takes left side so -7
@mdiluz the thinking is correct, the answer nope :)
@aras oh. Oh no.
If *both* sets of commas cancel, and comma takes right side (got it right first time...) , then arr is actually (3,6,9),(12,15,18)... etc. Meaning we should have -21?
@aras or, well, not both "cancelling", the second set should aggregate? Don't know how to describe that, but C let's you initialize struct members in an array sequentially, so I'm sticking with -21
@aras I couldn't take the insanity and wrote it out. Looks right. Oh man. What a hellscape this language is.
Shouldn't it print 1 ?
arr[idx] is syntax sugar for *(arr + idx) so -1[p] == p[-1], and since p starts at the second element you should have the first then.
But does it compiles everywhere ?
Years ago, I had a similar situation with compiler warning about arithmetic operation on pointers, like "trying to access the *p value of the -1 array", but I don't remember well so I'll say 1, .x value of the 0th element 🙂
@Xipiryon hint 1: it does not index by -1, due to operation precedence.
Then -7 ? Since p already points to arr, then it's -((p+1)->x), so the 3rd element of the array 🙂
At least I hope operator precedence doesn't imply (-(p+1))->x, because it lools like an undefined behaviour then 😅
Oh and btw it's super nice of you to take the time to answer everyone !
@Xipiryon third element of the array, bingo! but that's not 7 or -7 :P
Game development! Discussions about game development and related fields, and/or by game developers and related professions.