i wish mastodon/activitypub/whatever had a "no boosts" option, the option to turn off replies to a post (as in nobody can attach replies to it, not me not seeing their replies), and a "only show this to people I follow" option. the "followers only" option is fucking terrible
*smashes favorite button*
@aeva boosting and replying to this post
@aeva "mutuals only" would be extremely welcome, but… what's the problem with "followers only?" it feels sometimes useful to me
@glyph it's never the thing I need and when I pick it as the closest approximation visibility option it almost always backfires horrifically because i have 7,000 followers who are mostly not mutuals with one another and they can't see eachother's replies
@glyph @pendell what I do know is that if I post something, and people see it and think "I will literally die if I do not post a corrective reply right now" what happens is I get essentially the same reply dozens of times from people who seem to be completely unaware of what they're doing, and my mentions become unreadable.
@glyph @pendell so i can't post things like "i'm frustrated my dog shit proprioception means i need a laptop that can withstand being dropped more than three inches and all the ethical-ish options that have enough power seem to be made out of glass and wishes" without 10,000 people telling me I can cure my EDS with meditation and exercise and/or accusing me of being personally responsible for the end of the world
@glyph @pendell i mean yes and no. a lot of times it's just that theory of mind is hard. if a friend (parasocial or otherwise) is suffering from a problem that on the surface seems similar to a problem you have a solution for that works for you, it's natural to want to offer the solution when you don't have the benefit of knowing it won't work and it might not be obvious the other person has in fact tried meditation.
@glyph @pendell if i could set it to people i follow only then the number of people that could reply in the first place is about 1000 instead which would probably translate to about 10 people telling me to try meditation and exercise and accusing me of singlehandedly supporting the evil proprietary laptop industrial complex, which is a lot more manageable
@aeva @glyph it's already annoying when people want to question your reasons instead of answering your question, but that's even worse, that's people basically telling you to stop being disabled to fix your issue, jeez. And yeah it's insane how the laptop market used to have so many different options and builds and now everything is either a macbook or a netbook made for grandpas to check email on.
@aeva @glyph framework has so many cool ideas but theyre just making macbooks blended with netbooks. "what if you could replace broken parts" doesn't mean much if you then design the laptop to break as easily and quickly as possible. How much of that thing is held together with magnets and prayers? Most rugged option that really exists are Toshiba Toughbooks but those are like "$12k for 3 year old i5, 128GB mSATA, and 8gb DDR4"
@pendell @aeva wait is "macbook" a metonym for "fragile" here? as the fediverse's resident apple shill I always find this equation confusing since as I understand it the only data ever collected on this topic shows that macbooks are more reliable than their next closest competitor by 50%, and more reliable than the industry average by double that
@pendell @aeva
(Not literally shilling for Apple here. Please do not buy their products, everyone should use Linux, if Apple ever achieves a monoculture in laptops they will lock everything down to the point that I will no longer be able to use them, and I like them quite a bit, only competition keeps them honest.)
@pendell @aeva I ask because I'm really curious though. that data is almost a decade old at this point, it could be wrong, and people who work in repair have told me they see a lot of macbooks and apple has widely known design defects on some models, and they don't see nearly as many PC laptops with problems, but, like, plane-with-bullet-holes.jpg
@glyph it's possible your plane-with-bullet-holes may apply more to that original statistic, that they're more reliable than their competitors. Who sell BILLIONS more laptops than Apple does, targeting vastly wider price brackets. It is true though that a bunch of $200 Walmart specials will probably have more failures than a $3k supercomputer. I worked in a depot repairing Dell Latitudes all day, one should also consider what cheaply made school laptops go through and how those factor in.
@glyph @pendell i suspect the comparison might have been a separate criticism from framework's durability, but the last time i've interacted significantly with a new macbook was about ten years ago. my aesthetic sensibilities are elsewhere so the similarity makes it feel like a kockoff of something i don't want anyway
@pendell @glyph magnets, prayers, and *five* screws
the ease of opening is a strange choice on their part. i have had a much easier time repairing laptops that took much longer to open than this one. their push to make it easier ironically means that "repair" is probably going to be "buy a $700 motherboard with a processor soldered to it". i'm genuinely flabbergasted that broke before anything else (assuming nothing else broke, can't determine that yet)
@pendell @glyph back in the mid 2000s (decade) when i was still in college, I accidentally slammed my car's trunk down really hard against my thinkpad r60. i had to order a replacement lcd panel but that was it, i was out maybe $50 and back in action in a few days later. that thing had a platter drive lol. that thing still has a platter drive because i haven't thrown it away yet. it's generated less ewaste than my framework to date
@aeva @glyph That really hits the nail on the head, a lot of their stuff feels superficially repairable rather than actually considering what users need. You're not gonna be opening it up all the time (unless it breaks all the time!), you just need parts that you CAN remove, that aren't soldered/glued/riveted into place. Plastic clips are fine! Little fiddly bits that add stability and rigidity are actually awesome guys! Genuinely at my job we got Dells that were marginally more repairable.
@aeva @glyph their killer concept is the hot-swappable USB-C based I/O, everything else looks kinda lackluster and weird. I don't want to hold the lack of swappable CPU against them, since I'm sure mobile CPU sockets haven't been done in so long they'd basically have to develop one from scratch which I imagine isn't easy. That's down to Intel and AMD I think. But I look at that keyboard and I shudder to think of what typing on it is like. I look at the pitiful thinness and wonder about thermals.
@glyph@mastodon.social @pendell@mastodon.social @aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place me, ironically not clicking over to your server to see if someone else has already made this reply: it just needs to be enabled on the server you live on for you to see all replies to a post on another server. Unfortunately, for it to fix the overall issue, it’ll have to be deployed to all the servers the 7000 reply guys are on…
@pendell @aeva @glyph Sorta parallel to that; posting followers only sets the default for replies on many clients to followers only, compounding the issues of toots missing because they aren’t being fetched. Either way, I hope no one else has already said this, as it’s pretty much why I rarely interact with bigger accounts.
@sendai @pendell @aeva I really wish there were some kind of visualization of all this, because if you do a followers-only post and I do a followers-only reply does that mean that only the intersection of our followers can see the reply? or do they see a detached thing? will it be on their timeline or hidden somewhere? I'm sure the answers to these things exist somewhere but I am annoyed that I have to go looking rather than having the UI just make it immediately clear
@aeva I recently went through my followers, looking for accounts of rather not follow me. And that's inadequate.
@aeva i miss the circles from Google+. It let me choose per post who can view it.
@kojack that was a nice feature
@aeva I frequently find myself wishing for a "trans people only" visibility option. It wouldn't have any privacy, abuse, or trust issues, because it would work by magic, of course. Also, eggs would be included. This should be totally doable, right?
@aeva mutuals only shouldn't be too hard to add. People you follow have a problem of distribution. Of these, the non-mutual won't receive your note because they don't follow you.
About the replies, my first reaction is "it's hard because it's not under control of your server". But your post could flag a note as "reply from people the author follow" and if most major server softwares respect it, that's 95% less noise and you can simply block people who do pirate reply
@gkrnours i'm not worried about malicious servers, i can block those
@aeva At least some of that is being worked on, but it really can't come soon enough. https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/issues/14762