mastodon.gamedev.place is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
Mastodon server focused on game development and related topics.

Server stats:

5.1K
active users

#license

5 posts5 participants0 posts today

TIL: The European Union Public License.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European

Looks pretty decent actually!

• OSI and FSF approved
• copyleft
• SaaS clause (like the AGPL)
• explicitly compatible with several copyleft licenses to allow EUPL code to be integrated into GPL, AGPL, LGPL, OSL, MPL etc. projects
• based on European law
• available in 23 languages, all with the same validity

en.wikipedia.orgEuropean Union Public Licence - Wikipedia

真的有人寄信要 GPL 授權的 copy...

Hacker News 上看到 2022 年的文章:「I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022) (mendhak.com)」,原文在「I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice and received the GPLv3 license」。 作者在 GPLv2 看到這段: You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 5…

blog.gslin.org/archives/2025/0

Gea-Suan Lin's BLOG · 真的有人寄信要 GPL 授權的 copy...Hacker News 上看到 2022 年的文章:「I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022) (mendhak.com)」,原文在「I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice and received the GPLv3 license」。 作者在 GPLv2 看到這段: You should have received a copy of the GNU Gen...
#copy#fsf#gnu

Maybe someone can help me:

I want to use a library. It's license is MIT. But I want to use a different version of this library someone else made (JS to TS). The TS version is GPL 3 though. It should include the MIT license of the original project if I understand correctly, but it doesn't. So that's their mistake.

Do I assume correctly that if I want to use the TS version, I have to include both the original MIT license and the GPL license?