Remember when online progressive #hacker / #privacy culture was anti-#copyright, anti-intellectual-property, pro-data hoarding and pro-piracy?
When the general utopia was a world where art was shared, free and the public collective property of all of society?
Why has everyone turned into the copyright police and decided "IP enforcement and DRM are good actually and I hope the state police finally does something to crack down on #cybercrime" since the #AI nonsense began?
Like, I am not pro-#GenAI in #art in the slightest, but I am upset that we all seem to collectively have done a 180 and now we're supposed to celebrate intellectual property enforcement, DRM and closed, paid, inaccessible art.
I still think art is a collective product of society and should not be guarded with intellectual property and copyright laws. That doesn't mean artists shouldn't be paid - it means that artists should be paid AND not hide art behind an inaccessible repressive law-wall.
@giacomo That might be your opinion. It's not common, much less the norm.
It's not a strawman - talk to those people. A large portion of the crowd behind the "protect artists" slogan are genuinely pro-DRM, pro-monetising every aspect of human life and expression (as long as the ones doing it aren't rich cishet white men but instead model minority "small businesses"), anti-copyleft, anti-common culture.
They *want* art and information to be inaccessible private property.