@iamada @mozillaofficial
> * Embraced web manifest v3 (which breaks ad-blockers) ref
It says very clearly in the linked article that they're still supporting Manifest v2. Adding Manifest v3 by itself doesn't hobble ad blockers, adding it and also removing Manifest v2 does. They're not doing that, unlike Chromium.
> It genuinely looks like they're actively violating their founding principles, purging any & all good-will for the sake of going for-profit..
In their (meagre) defence, they are attempting to no longer be reliant on Google as their sugar daddy (which is very obviously problematic), but they're going about it in the dumbest, most corporate and ham-fisted way imaginable.
I haven't seen this much cluelessness since the "death throes" days of RIM/Blackberry and Palm, Inc. :'(
(And heck, Palm was innovating like mad until the bitter end. It was just too little*, too late).
It blows my freaking mind that people in this thread are like, "Welp, I guess it's back to Chrome/Edge."
If that's anyone's answer to #Mozilla's stupid gaffes, then they might as well pack up today. The Techbros have won.
To be clear, I'm hella NOT ok with what Mozilla is doing, or has been doing for the past couple years.
But I'm sure as heck not going back to Chrome, or anything Blink-based, as long as I can avoid it.
* Correction. It really wasn't too little. #WebOS was amazing. It was simply too dadgum late. :(